Showing posts with label Advertisements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Advertisements. Show all posts

The Industrial Food Complex: Take the Red Pill with 'The Meatrix'

Monday, October 6, 2008

What do you get when you mix:
  • Creativity
  • The Matrix
  • Facts about industrial dairy farms
  • And a lot of time?
The Meatrix!

Part 1




Part 2




Part 2 1/2



So be thankful for living in the digital age, otherwise creative advertising like this wouldn't exist!

Another Crazy Commercial Promoting High Fructose Corn Syrup

Friday, October 3, 2008

I don't know why it didn't occur to me to check back in on our friends at Sweet Surprise. Perhaps I figured they'd give up on their advertising campaign promoting high fructose corn syrup? Thankfully not! If their last two commercials didn't sway you, this one certainly will:


Sweet Surprise Ad 3 - Grab some popcorn (don't worry, it's healthy because it's made from corn) then click on "Brothers", and sit back and enjoy the show.

These ads are so beloved, that "tribute" ads are popping up all over YouTube. I've done the dirty work for you, below are my two favorites:







I pledge to put up their next commercial as soon as is humanly possible. If anyone happens to see it before I do, please drop me a note so we can all bask in its awesomeness.

Check out the post about the original 2 HFCS ads.

A Tour through Food Headlines: 1975 - 2005

Thursday, September 11, 2008

This is a continuation of A Tour through Food Headlines: 1935-1965. Using Google News Archive, I searched old newspaper archives for the phrase "healthy food" and took one of the first few relevant results from each of the last 8 decades.

In the first article, we caught glimpses of the important issues and general mindset of the time period: meat saftey in the 1930's, sugar rationing in the 1940's, scrawny nervous girls in the 1950's, and reducing your food budget in the 1960's. Amusingly, many of the articles I looked at spoke explicitly to woman, plainly acknowledging them as the cooks of the household.

How quickly things change as we approach our modern food culture...

1975

(photo courtesy of roadsidepictures)

Newspaper
: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date: Mar 17, 1975
Sample Excerpt: 
"That means 1) one daily serving of leafy, green or yellow vegetables. 2) At least one serving of citrus fruits, tomatoes, cabbage or salad grens. 3) At least one serving of potatoes or other vegetables and fruits. 4) At least one serving of milk or a milk product .... 7) Optional: one serving of butter, margarine or polyunsaturated oils."
My comments: 1975 marked the year in my research (I was only looking in 10 year intervals) that dieting came up on the first page of results. While searching for accompanying photos, I also began to stumble across fast-food related imagery for the first time. 

Where did that USDA Food Pyramid come from anyway? And isn't everything you need to know about it contained in the headline of the second article? It's taken us hundreds, if not thousands of years to develop complex scientific theories, so why is it that we believe "scientific" food wisdom, especially when it changes difinitively every few years?


1985



Newspaper: New York Times
Date: October 13, 1985
Sample Excerpt: 
Some of the hottest new food fashions are hardly nutritious: croissants, with 65 percent fat (compared to 2 percent in bread); many not-so-lean and salty gourmet frozen dinners; quiches loaded with fat, salt and cholesterol; fatty and salty toppings stuffed into nearly fat-free baked potatoes; upscale yogurts made with high-fat milk and sugared fruits and flavorings; soft drinks artificially sweetened with medically controversial NutraSweet. And, ironically, the health-food industry, which helped to fire the interest in wholesome foods, has lost its innocence. Now, it pushes a bevy of highly processed candy bars, cookies and chips, often aligned on racks near the health-food store checkout counter.
Present day headline equivalent: Study says junk food still dominates youth TV
My comments: Here is where we start to see the beginnings of the same trap we are currently in. The diet culture starts to kick in, leaving consumers confused and making potentially worse choices. If the soda is "diet", then I can drink more of it! If we process out all the "bad" parts, I don't have to feel guilty anymore.


1995

(photo courtesy of sincretic)

Newspaper: Business Wire
Date: February 7, 1995 
Sample Excerpt: 
Consumer demand for healthy fast food has started to change the face of the industry. Wednesday's anticipated "light menu" launch by Taco Bell will try to capitalize on the consumer demand for more healthy choices, but according to El Pollo Loco Director of Marketing Lou Franson, the giant PepsiCo subsidiary's good intentions are off the mark.

"Healthy food -- such as the flame-broiled chicken, pinto beans and Spanish rice that we have served for more than 20 years -- is a rare find in the fast-food industry," he said.
My comments: At first I had to laugh - was he actually convinced that flame-broiled chicken, pinto beans and spanish rice counts as "healthy food"? Then I had to remind myself that the point is to eat real food (not necessarily "health food" which can be highly processed), so maybe in a sense, that is a much healthier meal than what you'd get at Taco Bell. Take a look at the present day article - 13 years later, Taco Bell still serves up 75% of your daily calories in ONE salad.


2005

(image courtesy of digital_trash)
Newspaper: USA Today
Date: August 23, 2005
Sample Excerpt: 
Students can pick up fast foods, including hamburgers, french fries, fried chicken and doughnuts, on the way to and from school, Austin says. Some high school students can go off campus at lunchtime to eat it, she notes. "Five days a week we send children to an environment where there's an abundance of high-calorie, low-nutritional-quality, inexpensive food."
My comments: I have little idea of what goes on foodwise in public schools, but from what I have read: we should be afraid. Schools sign contracts, yes endorsement deals, with large food companies (like Coca-cola) to make sure they receive prominent placement in the hallways. There is a growing movement that sugar is one of the main causes of modern day child behavior problems, including ADD and ADHD. Why is that a surprise?

If you liked this article, please let me know...so I can do more like it in the future! Also, if you haven't already, read Part 1.

A Tour through Food Headlines: 1935-1965

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Google News recently announced they would be providing scanned archives of old newspapers, so I thought I would take this opportunity to see how food headlines and advice has changed over the years. Starting in 1935, I searched for "healthy food" at 10 year intervals and picked one of the top few results. Here is what I found:


1935

(image courtesy of the Seattle Municipal Archives)

Newspaper: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date: Mar 15, 1935
Sample excerpt:
"The popularity of prepared meats such as ham, liverwurst or bologna has grown rapidly within the last decade. Meats used for cold cuts must be sound, wholesome, lean and freshly taken from the slaughtered animal.

It is essential then that one who secures products of this type be assured of the integrity of the packer and the wholesomeness of the product. Bacterial multiplication takes place in such products very quickly under improper conditions."
Present day headline equivalent: Schools issue cautions about prepared meats
My comments: Meat cleanliness and safety has been a huge concern for at least the last one hundred years. Why isn't this a problem we can solve? As demand for meat in developing countries continues to skyrocket, look for this to become and increasingly important issue.


1945

(image courtesy of Dena v.d.Wal)

Newspaper: The Evening Independent
Date: May 1, 1945
Sample excerpt: 
"A decent American diet will be maintained. Our food supply is adequate to keep America healthy and vigorous even though we shall have to make some adjustments in particular foods."

...

"As a result, the average American, who last year consumed 89 pounds of sugar, will receive only 72.1 pounds this year."
Present day headline equivalent: One Sweet Nation
My comments: 89 pounds is a lot. One Sweet Nation however quotes us at 114 pounds per year in 1963 and 142 pounds per year in 2003.  This 1945 headline obviously is from World War II, but can you imagine if headlines tomorrow told us we would need to ration a particular type of food? There would be rioting in the streets!


1955

(image courtesy of Maproom Systems)

Newspaper: St. Petersburg Times
Date: Mar 25, 1955
Sample excerpt: 
"For example, when you go into a restaurant for lunch, perhaps you have to wait for a table, then wait to be served. Unless you're relaxed, you'll sit there seething at the delay. Deliberately change your habitual response to this situation. Get a newspaper, read and relax. Otherwise you'll respond with tension. This tension is relayed to the muscles in your innerbrain - and from that nerve center to your stomach, heart, salivary glands, etc. And this is the way appetite and assimilation of food is impaired."
Present day headline equivalent: The Size Zero Pill
My comments: Wow, and I thought people were uptight these days. And no, you won't be seeing any modern articles about Americans who need to gain weight.


1965

(image courtesy of spike55151)

Newspaper: St. Petersburg Times
Date: Oct 8, 1965
Sample excerpt: 
"You needn't, and shouldn't spend over 20 percent of your budget on food, no matter how little you earn. During 1963, the average family spent less than 19 per cent for our eating at home."
Present day headline equivalent: Food Expenditures as a share of Disposable Income
My comments: Although the food expenditures link above differs with the information presented in the 1965 article, the trend is clear. As late as 1950 over 20% of our budgets went to food. Today, that number has fallen to less than 10%. Regarding food "in the home", we spend roughly one quarter of what we used to spend. As for eating out, we now spend 33% more on eating out than we did 70 years ago. Although that's a substantial jump, I'm actually surprised it isn't higher.

Stay tuned for the next article, covering 1975-2005. Any comments or feedback on this post would be greatly appreciated.

High Fructose Corn Syrup: TV says it's good for you

Monday, September 8, 2008

Thanks to both Fast Food News and The Accidental Hedonist for this bit of news.

Apparently, there is enough of a building consumer push towards healthier food that the industrial food complex (I love how evil that phrase sounds, don't you?) is running political food ads. High fructose corn syrup is getting a bad rap these days, and according to them, for no good reason.





Obviously it's perfectly natural and healthy - it's made of corn after all! Well, here are a few other things made from corn:

  • Adhesives (glues, pastes, mucilages, gums, etc.)
  • Aluminum
  • Antibiotics (penicillin)
  • Asbestos insulation
  • Aspirin
  • Automobiles: cylinder heads, ethanol - fuel & windshield washer fluid, spark plugs, synthetic rubber finishes, tires
If this list seems surprisingly alphabetic, I merely took the first 6 items from this list of corn uses, provided by some sort of Canadian corn advocacy group. Frankly, I thought it would take longer than 5 seconds of googling to prove my point. Take a look for yourself, there is other stuff like: candy, potato chips, licorice, mayonnaise, soda, whiskey, etc. None of which you can really make a case for as foods we "should be eating".

Yes, high fructose corn syrup won't kill you, immediately. But it's no coincidence that the number of children developing diabetes in this country correlates nicely with the rise in sweeteners (primarily high fructose corn syrup, or HFCS) being processed into just about everything at the supermarket. Why not eliminate the middle man and have us all just put our lips around the spout on the back of one of these?


(image courtesy of boeke)

The big joke with the punchline of these commercials is that you won't have any problems "in moderation". There is already enough hidden sugar in our diets (real sugars and all the ingredients that end in -ose) that we aren't even aware of (in sauces, dressings, breads, cereals, etc), that it is absolutely irresponsible to suggest that we have room for more in the form of popsicles and red sugar-water/juice, as depicted in the commercials.

So, despite fact that the "opposers" in the commercials have a strong enough stance against HFCS that they would condescendingly mention it to a friend (only the truly committed take it that far), they are instantly swayed back to the other side by one eloquent sentence? No, the people who are already anti-HFCS will not be phased by this ridiculous bit of self-serving propaganda. It is the people who were on the fence. And sadly, those are the people who can really make a difference, because there are a lot of them.

 
The Reluctant Eater - Design by Templates para novo blogger || Strawberry image courtesy of Darren Hester