Grow Your Own Food

Monday, September 15, 2008

Apparently, there are people out there growing food in their own backyards - even though they live in the city. Check out this article on Urban Farming from Wired Magazine.


The article itself isn't very detailed, and instead serves as more of an anecdote for a growing trend (no pun intended). My favorite parts was this statistic:
Remember the victory garden? During World Wars I and II, the government urged city dwellers and suburbanites to plant food in their yards. It worked: The effort grew roughly 40 percent of the fresh veggies consumed in the US in 1942 and 1943.
Urban and suburban non-farmers grew 40% of the nations vegetables, just because the government asked?!? What a remarkable stat about how easily we can all start becoming more self sufficient. The movement would have to come from within though, the government today can barely get us to recycle 40% of our garbage, an act which requires almost zero extra work!

Friday Interview: Mike Wanger

Friday, September 12, 2008

Today's interviewee is Mike Wanger, founder and president of Lakefront Billing Service. A member on the board of Second Harvest (now Feeding America) for 10 years, like many of us, Mike has struggled through several different food cultures over the last few decades. The Reluctant Eater had a chance to talk with him, now that his stomach has settled...


TRE: Mike, with respect to your eating habits, you've been through a variety of different phases throughout your life. Can you walk us through your food history?


MW: Sure. Growing up, Mom was a great cook with an appreciation of the value of nutrition and a balanced diet. We four kids ate the "standard American fare" for the time (50s & 60s), augmented with occasional experimental dishes from her assorted cookbooks. She would always "star-rate" each new dish in the book, along with our comments. She took cooking classes, including cake-decorating -- her cakes were invariably the grand prize at our grammar school cakewalk. Except for home-baked cookies (i.e. snickerdoodles), I don't recall eating much dessert or "junk" food. None of us ever had a weight issue. When we went out, we would always share bites of our meals. Consequently, I learned to enjoy and appreciate new and different foods.

College was mostly cafeteria food. We managed to avoid malnutrition by supplementing it with the four basic food groups: big macs, donuts, chips, and gum.

Early 20s: During early marriage, we both worked, so meals were simple: We would cook almost every night from our wok. Meat, veggies, and rice. Delicious.

One night a vegetarian friend came over. During the course of dinner, we asked how he came to embrace it, expecting some spiritually-transforming story. Not quite: He worked at a rendering plant. One day he slipped on the ice and fell into their swimming pool filled with animal carcasses. We joined the club that night.

At that time I was quite serious about "the Path", of which vegetarianism was an integral part. Looking back on those years, pictures confirm that I was skinny, pale, and I remember not feeling all that well or alert. After a few years, I went back to eating meat, and felt much better. However, an acute desire to maintain a healthy "temple" was ingrained: shopping the perimeter of grocery stores became a habit.

My diet since has remained basically stable: granola, fruit and coffee for breakfast, a big organic salad for lunch, then whatever for dinner. The last 3-4 years, I shop exclusively at our neighborhood organic foods co-op. My life is pretty busy, and cooking for one didn't make sense to me, so I got in the habit of eating cold deli food (from the co-op) for dinner. I eat out maybe two nights a week, and like just about everything. Lately, my new girlfriend cooks for me, so that's been a treat.

Because I still felt funky quite often, I had my blood tested recently and discovered insensitivities to over 25 foods. I quit eating them for 3 to 6 months, then slowly reintroduced them, and don't feel reactionary any more. Additionally, the test showed an allergy to dairy. "Allergy" as in "Your body will never handle this food properly". So giving that up has been interesting.


TRE: Most people aren't aware that humans were never really designed to digest dairy from cows. Yet, somehow it became a staple of our diet, even though a majority of people experience problems with it on some level, be it very minor digestion issues, or a full blown allergy as in your situation. Any advice for people who may not be paying attention to what their bodies are telling them about the foods they eat?

MW: I don't know anyone who would put crappy gas in their car. Yet they pay no attention to how they fuel their bodies. If your car breaks, no biggy -- you can always buy another one. We don't have that luxury with our body -- it's the only one we've got. When we're young, we're bullet-proof. Look at most folks in their 60s, 70s, 80s -- do YOU want to be like that when you finally get your life's dream of getting off the wheel and enjoying retirement?

The body is an incredible machine of mind-blowing complexity and genius. It is generally self-repairing, but wears down over time. Geneticists are maybe 20-30 years away from significant gains in genetic life-extension, but who wants to live longer in a decrepit frame? We each have the choice to significantly influence our future health. At retirement you can be fabulously wealthy, but if you don't have good health, how're you going to enjoy it?

Part of our health issue is our current system of health insurance. Why should I change my lifestyle to eat more healthy and exercise when I can instead get a "free" pill from a doctor? (Even if that pill is nothing but a band-aid. I don't have to "be" better -- I just want to "feel" better.) If we all had no health insurance, I would bet most of us would be much more seriously invested in our personal habits and diet.


TRE: Why doesn't everyone realize right away when their bodies are giving them specific clues to what they should be eating? What were some of your clues?


MW: It's just habit, built up over many years. You're used to feeling lousy or mediocre, and don't know or remember anything else. You might be aware that there is an alternative, but dietary changes take effort, and life might be crammed with other "priorities", or maybe you feel you "can't afford" it. There are plenty of excuses -- We live in a very diverse society with plenty of options, and supermarkets and the advertising media lead you down the path of processed foods.


TRE: Apparently, when I was young I started asking for meat, and that was that - no more vegetarian household. Somehow, your eating habits have never seemed to get in the way. Do you ever preach to people on "the other side" about how to eat? Or is that like religion & politics...no one can talk you into change, it needs to come from within?


MW: I think that most people don't like to be preached to about changing their beliefs. Plus, if a change in diet/exercise is made, the American way is that it wasn't done until it became a crisis (kind of like what we're doing with our national debt). So, a couple of pointers:

1) The closer the relationship, the more likely that person will listen;

2) As with giving any advice, first ascertain where the person you're talking with is at. A "cave man", overweight, single friend of mine has commented a couple of times on my "strange" (read: salad) meal. I know he wants a woman. So, I might simply say "the ladies, they dig the six-pack". Regardless of who it is, I usually give a simple general retort, then see if they pry me for more. Bottom line: Going easy seems to work best. (By the way, I noticed he's now on the "salad train".)

Philosophically, I'm not interested so much in changing the world, just in changing myself. So I'm more often a soft-sell who lets example speak for itself.


TRE: I seem to remember you being interested in hydroponics at some point. How did you become interested in that, and what became of it?


MW: A spiritual community I occasionally visit had an impressive basement hydroponics operation. I did some research and decided to give it a try. The first crop was leggy with minimal "fruit", so I likely needed only to tweak the nutrient balance. Then life got busier and I let it slide. Hopefully to be resuscitated in retirement?


TRE: You were also involved in a group called Second Harvest (note: name it's name has since changed to Feeding America), what was your role there?


MW: I was on their Board for 10 years.


TRE: Okay. For most of us, we are well off enough to treat food as a luxury. We buy brand name items. We buy desserts, General Mills cereals and frozen dinners. Did working with an organization that feeds the hungry give you a different perspective on food?


MW: No, not on food. But it did bring poverty and cultural struggles/disparities more into personal focus. We all read stories about "the poor" and those facing various hardships, but since it's "someone else" and not "me", and since the media is keen on giving us our daily dose of sensationalism, I think we can become indifferent or numb to it all. At Second Harvest, I saw the folks shopping. They were struggling to make ends meet, yet they were upbeat and grateful. At our meetings, we reviewed appeals from churches and pantries that were too impoverished to pay even the 10 cents per pound that we charged to cover our costs. The experience opened my eyes and heart to helping those less fortunate.


TRE: Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experiences Mike. Do you have any final piece of advice or parting words for our readers?


MW: You're welcome, Ryan. I'm glad to contribute to an effort to raise consciousness about health and diet -- this blog is a great idea! Final thoughts: Even small changes in diet, coupled with regular exercise, can make a difference as we age. And don't forget the mental piece: Think young, act young, BE young!

A Tour through Food Headlines: 1975 - 2005

Thursday, September 11, 2008

This is a continuation of A Tour through Food Headlines: 1935-1965. Using Google News Archive, I searched old newspaper archives for the phrase "healthy food" and took one of the first few relevant results from each of the last 8 decades.

In the first article, we caught glimpses of the important issues and general mindset of the time period: meat saftey in the 1930's, sugar rationing in the 1940's, scrawny nervous girls in the 1950's, and reducing your food budget in the 1960's. Amusingly, many of the articles I looked at spoke explicitly to woman, plainly acknowledging them as the cooks of the household.

How quickly things change as we approach our modern food culture...

1975

(photo courtesy of roadsidepictures)

Newspaper
: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date: Mar 17, 1975
Sample Excerpt: 
"That means 1) one daily serving of leafy, green or yellow vegetables. 2) At least one serving of citrus fruits, tomatoes, cabbage or salad grens. 3) At least one serving of potatoes or other vegetables and fruits. 4) At least one serving of milk or a milk product .... 7) Optional: one serving of butter, margarine or polyunsaturated oils."
My comments: 1975 marked the year in my research (I was only looking in 10 year intervals) that dieting came up on the first page of results. While searching for accompanying photos, I also began to stumble across fast-food related imagery for the first time. 

Where did that USDA Food Pyramid come from anyway? And isn't everything you need to know about it contained in the headline of the second article? It's taken us hundreds, if not thousands of years to develop complex scientific theories, so why is it that we believe "scientific" food wisdom, especially when it changes difinitively every few years?


1985



Newspaper: New York Times
Date: October 13, 1985
Sample Excerpt: 
Some of the hottest new food fashions are hardly nutritious: croissants, with 65 percent fat (compared to 2 percent in bread); many not-so-lean and salty gourmet frozen dinners; quiches loaded with fat, salt and cholesterol; fatty and salty toppings stuffed into nearly fat-free baked potatoes; upscale yogurts made with high-fat milk and sugared fruits and flavorings; soft drinks artificially sweetened with medically controversial NutraSweet. And, ironically, the health-food industry, which helped to fire the interest in wholesome foods, has lost its innocence. Now, it pushes a bevy of highly processed candy bars, cookies and chips, often aligned on racks near the health-food store checkout counter.
Present day headline equivalent: Study says junk food still dominates youth TV
My comments: Here is where we start to see the beginnings of the same trap we are currently in. The diet culture starts to kick in, leaving consumers confused and making potentially worse choices. If the soda is "diet", then I can drink more of it! If we process out all the "bad" parts, I don't have to feel guilty anymore.


1995

(photo courtesy of sincretic)

Newspaper: Business Wire
Date: February 7, 1995 
Sample Excerpt: 
Consumer demand for healthy fast food has started to change the face of the industry. Wednesday's anticipated "light menu" launch by Taco Bell will try to capitalize on the consumer demand for more healthy choices, but according to El Pollo Loco Director of Marketing Lou Franson, the giant PepsiCo subsidiary's good intentions are off the mark.

"Healthy food -- such as the flame-broiled chicken, pinto beans and Spanish rice that we have served for more than 20 years -- is a rare find in the fast-food industry," he said.
My comments: At first I had to laugh - was he actually convinced that flame-broiled chicken, pinto beans and spanish rice counts as "healthy food"? Then I had to remind myself that the point is to eat real food (not necessarily "health food" which can be highly processed), so maybe in a sense, that is a much healthier meal than what you'd get at Taco Bell. Take a look at the present day article - 13 years later, Taco Bell still serves up 75% of your daily calories in ONE salad.


2005

(image courtesy of digital_trash)
Newspaper: USA Today
Date: August 23, 2005
Sample Excerpt: 
Students can pick up fast foods, including hamburgers, french fries, fried chicken and doughnuts, on the way to and from school, Austin says. Some high school students can go off campus at lunchtime to eat it, she notes. "Five days a week we send children to an environment where there's an abundance of high-calorie, low-nutritional-quality, inexpensive food."
My comments: I have little idea of what goes on foodwise in public schools, but from what I have read: we should be afraid. Schools sign contracts, yes endorsement deals, with large food companies (like Coca-cola) to make sure they receive prominent placement in the hallways. There is a growing movement that sugar is one of the main causes of modern day child behavior problems, including ADD and ADHD. Why is that a surprise?

If you liked this article, please let me know...so I can do more like it in the future! Also, if you haven't already, read Part 1.

A Tour through Food Headlines: 1935-1965

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Google News recently announced they would be providing scanned archives of old newspapers, so I thought I would take this opportunity to see how food headlines and advice has changed over the years. Starting in 1935, I searched for "healthy food" at 10 year intervals and picked one of the top few results. Here is what I found:


1935

(image courtesy of the Seattle Municipal Archives)

Newspaper: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date: Mar 15, 1935
Sample excerpt:
"The popularity of prepared meats such as ham, liverwurst or bologna has grown rapidly within the last decade. Meats used for cold cuts must be sound, wholesome, lean and freshly taken from the slaughtered animal.

It is essential then that one who secures products of this type be assured of the integrity of the packer and the wholesomeness of the product. Bacterial multiplication takes place in such products very quickly under improper conditions."
Present day headline equivalent: Schools issue cautions about prepared meats
My comments: Meat cleanliness and safety has been a huge concern for at least the last one hundred years. Why isn't this a problem we can solve? As demand for meat in developing countries continues to skyrocket, look for this to become and increasingly important issue.


1945

(image courtesy of Dena v.d.Wal)

Newspaper: The Evening Independent
Date: May 1, 1945
Sample excerpt: 
"A decent American diet will be maintained. Our food supply is adequate to keep America healthy and vigorous even though we shall have to make some adjustments in particular foods."

...

"As a result, the average American, who last year consumed 89 pounds of sugar, will receive only 72.1 pounds this year."
Present day headline equivalent: One Sweet Nation
My comments: 89 pounds is a lot. One Sweet Nation however quotes us at 114 pounds per year in 1963 and 142 pounds per year in 2003.  This 1945 headline obviously is from World War II, but can you imagine if headlines tomorrow told us we would need to ration a particular type of food? There would be rioting in the streets!


1955

(image courtesy of Maproom Systems)

Newspaper: St. Petersburg Times
Date: Mar 25, 1955
Sample excerpt: 
"For example, when you go into a restaurant for lunch, perhaps you have to wait for a table, then wait to be served. Unless you're relaxed, you'll sit there seething at the delay. Deliberately change your habitual response to this situation. Get a newspaper, read and relax. Otherwise you'll respond with tension. This tension is relayed to the muscles in your innerbrain - and from that nerve center to your stomach, heart, salivary glands, etc. And this is the way appetite and assimilation of food is impaired."
Present day headline equivalent: The Size Zero Pill
My comments: Wow, and I thought people were uptight these days. And no, you won't be seeing any modern articles about Americans who need to gain weight.


1965

(image courtesy of spike55151)

Newspaper: St. Petersburg Times
Date: Oct 8, 1965
Sample excerpt: 
"You needn't, and shouldn't spend over 20 percent of your budget on food, no matter how little you earn. During 1963, the average family spent less than 19 per cent for our eating at home."
Present day headline equivalent: Food Expenditures as a share of Disposable Income
My comments: Although the food expenditures link above differs with the information presented in the 1965 article, the trend is clear. As late as 1950 over 20% of our budgets went to food. Today, that number has fallen to less than 10%. Regarding food "in the home", we spend roughly one quarter of what we used to spend. As for eating out, we now spend 33% more on eating out than we did 70 years ago. Although that's a substantial jump, I'm actually surprised it isn't higher.

Stay tuned for the next article, covering 1975-2005. Any comments or feedback on this post would be greatly appreciated.

Cooking Lessons in your Underwear

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Another tip from The Accidental Hedonist, who points us to Rouxbe. Rouxbe is basically an online cooking school. There are currently almost 200 recipes with full instructional videos (although after your 30 day trial expires, you have to pay for the videos - $99/yr or $199 lifetime). 




There are also 100 recipes without videos, and user submitted recipes. Recipes are rated by people who have made them, and often a discussion ensues in the comments section where you'll pick up some extra tips. Also, there is a full range of cooking school videos, as well as short drill down lessons like: how to pick out olive oil, how to remove a chicken tendon, what is lemongrass, etc.

The first lesson is entitled "Wheat & Gluten", which actually turned out to be pretty interesting. I now know more about different types of bread than I ever though I would, and sadly, I realized that I've been cheating all along with my new breadmaker. I would love the lesson, because the first exercise is to make pancakes. You actually set some aside some of the batter and stir it an extra 2 minutes too long, and compare the results. To my surprise, it made a huge difference in the quality of the breakfast.


This looks like an amazing resource for budding chefs who want to learn all the extra little tips most normal people don't know about. My next assignment: pizza!

High Fructose Corn Syrup: TV says it's good for you

Monday, September 8, 2008

Thanks to both Fast Food News and The Accidental Hedonist for this bit of news.

Apparently, there is enough of a building consumer push towards healthier food that the industrial food complex (I love how evil that phrase sounds, don't you?) is running political food ads. High fructose corn syrup is getting a bad rap these days, and according to them, for no good reason.





Obviously it's perfectly natural and healthy - it's made of corn after all! Well, here are a few other things made from corn:

  • Adhesives (glues, pastes, mucilages, gums, etc.)
  • Aluminum
  • Antibiotics (penicillin)
  • Asbestos insulation
  • Aspirin
  • Automobiles: cylinder heads, ethanol - fuel & windshield washer fluid, spark plugs, synthetic rubber finishes, tires
If this list seems surprisingly alphabetic, I merely took the first 6 items from this list of corn uses, provided by some sort of Canadian corn advocacy group. Frankly, I thought it would take longer than 5 seconds of googling to prove my point. Take a look for yourself, there is other stuff like: candy, potato chips, licorice, mayonnaise, soda, whiskey, etc. None of which you can really make a case for as foods we "should be eating".

Yes, high fructose corn syrup won't kill you, immediately. But it's no coincidence that the number of children developing diabetes in this country correlates nicely with the rise in sweeteners (primarily high fructose corn syrup, or HFCS) being processed into just about everything at the supermarket. Why not eliminate the middle man and have us all just put our lips around the spout on the back of one of these?


(image courtesy of boeke)

The big joke with the punchline of these commercials is that you won't have any problems "in moderation". There is already enough hidden sugar in our diets (real sugars and all the ingredients that end in -ose) that we aren't even aware of (in sauces, dressings, breads, cereals, etc), that it is absolutely irresponsible to suggest that we have room for more in the form of popsicles and red sugar-water/juice, as depicted in the commercials.

So, despite fact that the "opposers" in the commercials have a strong enough stance against HFCS that they would condescendingly mention it to a friend (only the truly committed take it that far), they are instantly swayed back to the other side by one eloquent sentence? No, the people who are already anti-HFCS will not be phased by this ridiculous bit of self-serving propaganda. It is the people who were on the fence. And sadly, those are the people who can really make a difference, because there are a lot of them.

Friday Interview: Claire Hunsaker

Friday, September 5, 2008

This week, The Reluctant Eater would like to welcome Claire Hunsaker. Claire is an avid traveler who isn't afraid to sink her teeth into strange and unknown fruit, which she proves over and over in her Vietnam Blog. Currently a student at Stanford Business School, she can be often found catching waves in the Pacific.

TRE: Chau co Claire! Even though you're abroad in a foreign country right now (Vietnam), most of your blog posts revolve around food, especially fruit. Clearly you're a woman who doesn't mess around when it comes to eating?


CH: Chao anh! 

No messing around for me! Before I became a vegetarian, I only had two food rules: It can't be on fire and it can't bite back. Rule number two was enacted after I tried lemon-flavored ants on a hike in the amazon rainforest. Tasty, but not going down without a fight! 

Now, I eat anything that isn't smart enough to be scared of me, or on fire. One of my coworkers described my attitude towards food safety as "eat it and hope for the best." 


TRE: When did you become a vegetarian, and what brought you to make that decision?


CH: I was a vegetarian for most of middle school, highschool and part of college – mostly because I am just a big softie when it comes to animals and couldn't handle the thought of eating them. But I am, and always have been a big foodie, which is much tougher as a veggie. Living in New York, I think the opportunities to eat AMAZING food overpowered my feelings, and I very happily went back to eating meat. My mom, who had been waging a guerilla war against my vegetarianism for years, was thrilled. 

I started practicing Buddhism a couple of years ago, and as I became more serious, it felt really dissonant to try to live a life of "right action" while eating meat, but not dissonant enough to give up steak salad at Keens steakhouse. I didn't want to force myself into an eating habit that was...well, forced. So I was sort of waiting around for the internal motivation. Last summer, I was scuba diving in the Sinai peninsula, and the reef there is right off the beach. So you dive, and see all these fish communities, and interact with the fish, and then pop up onto the beach and there's a bunch of those fish on ice, glassy-eyed, waiting to be your dinner. It kind of flipped the switch, so being veggie felt right again. Now meat just turns me off, but I am not super strict about it when eating with friends. My theory is, my eating habits shouldn't torture anyone, especially whoever is cooking. 


TRE: What is it like to be a vegetarian in household that doesn't support your decision?


CH: Hmmm. I bet my sister has different memories of this, but I don't remember it as a big deal. I am probably the biggest foodie in the house and did a fair amount of the cooking. My mom would just as happily subsist on health bars, so she didn't cook that much. When she did, she would try to sneak meat into it. I probably had it coming thoough – I was more than a little prone to mooing obnoxiously at people when they ate hamburgers (which I don't do anymore). 

I had free reign in the kitchen though, and the best thing about being veg, which sort of started for me then, is that it forces you to think about cooking in different ways. Meat is easy to cook, and easy to make taste good. Tofu is a pain in the ass to cook, and tastes like wet cardboard unless you know what you're doing. Which I didn't (and probably still don't) - I made a lot of awful, bland western vegetarian stuff out of books like "The Enchanted Broccoli Forrest."  But we had a great Thai restaurant in town, which really inspired me. It only dawned on me this year, but the best way to cook veg, is to explore outside your ethnicity. I've had tofu doctored up and delicious about 15 different ways here in Vietnam and when I was travelling in the middle east last summer, every meze plate tasted different. I'm perfecting my baba ganoush!  


TRE: I've cut way back on my meat eating, but it's often hardest when I am traveling. Depending on where you are, it can still be difficult to find good non-meat dishes. In my experience, it seems like we are starting to see more veggie restaurants, but the non-veggie restaurants still only serve one or two vegetarian dishes. Does this surprise you?


CH: Sadly, no. I mark it up to the relative open-mindedness of the head chef. I think there is a prevalent belief that vegetarians don't care about their food, and therefore a plate of fettuccine with veggie medley and a bland cream sauce is sufficient to keep these culinarily extraneous guests satisfied. I don't go to these restaurants - if you can't be creative for all your guests, you don't deserve to cook. 

But there are great chefs who embrace the veg, and so many great veggie entrees. I had an amazing savory bread pudding with dill and fennel at Serpentine in San Francisco.  Last night I dreamt of bruschetta with goat cheese, olive tapenade and lemony hummus, all together, followed by roasted summer squash topped with crumbled smoked gouda, and a french black lentil cassoulet for mains. 


TRE: And that is why you should be the one with the food blog. Aside from being a vegetarian, do you have any other food guidelines?


CH: I don't really eat any fast food or processed food, but its more of an aversion than a guideline.


TRE: When you do end up eating something outside of your normal diet (processed, fast food, or meat), does your body notice?


CH: Weirdly, meat doesn't bug me at all, even red meat. Sometimes my body actually tells me to eat some red meat, which I mark down to anemia. But even a small amount of fast food will make me feel exhausted and gross, or heavily processed prepackaged food. Don't get me wrong, I like convenient food, but for frozen dinners, I stick to stuff like Annie's Organics which is fast and tasty, but doesn't have any preservatives. 


TRE: Thanks for taking the time to share your insights Claire. Do you have any parting words of wisdom or advice?


CH: You won’t know if its any good unless you try it. 

Claire Hunsaker is the founder of Little Pretty, purveyor of hand crafted jewelry. She can be reached at: claire@littlepretty.com

 
The Reluctant Eater - Design by Templates para novo blogger || Strawberry image courtesy of Darren Hester